1990 Ford RS 200 vs. 1958 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1990 Ford RS 200 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 1990 Ford RS 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford RS 200 | 1958 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | RS 200 | 12 M |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1170 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2500 mm |
