1990 Ford RS 200 vs. 1964 Morgan 4
To start off, 1990 Ford RS 200 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1964 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1964 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1964 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Ford RS 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford RS 200 | 1964 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Morgan |
| Model | RS 200 | 4 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1340 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 55 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2450 mm |
