1990 Ford RS 200 vs. 1969 Volkswagen 1600
To start off, 1990 Ford RS 200 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1969 Volkswagen 1600. (49 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1969 Volkswagen 1600.
Because 1990 Ford RS 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Volkswagen 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford RS 200 | 1969 Volkswagen 1600 | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | RS 200 | 1600 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 40 L |