1990 Ford RS 200 vs. 1972 Monteverdi 2000
To start off, 1990 Ford RS 200 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Monteverdi 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Monteverdi 2000 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Monteverdi 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Monteverdi 2000 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1990 Ford RS 200.
Because 1990 Ford RS 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford RS 200 | 1972 Monteverdi 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Monteverdi |
| Model | RS 200 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 82 L |
