1990 Ford RS 200 vs. 1979 Seat 131
To start off, 1990 Ford RS 200 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Seat 131 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Seat 131 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1979 Seat 131. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1979 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Ford RS 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Seat 131. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford RS 200 | 1979 Seat 131 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | RS 200 | 131 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.7 mm | 90 mm |
Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1005 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2500 mm |