1990 Ford RS 200 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1990 Ford RS 200 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford RS 200 (292 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (90 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1990 Ford RS 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford RS 200 | 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | RS 200 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1990 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2390 mm |