1990 Ford RS 200 vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 650 kg more than 1990 Ford RS 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford RS 200 | 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | RS 200 | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2730 mm |
