1990 Ford RS 200 vs. 2000 Nissan Pickup

To start off, 2000 Nissan Pickup is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 2,494 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Pickup is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2000 Nissan Pickup. (82 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 2000 Nissan Pickup. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Pickup weights approximately 265 kg more than 1990 Ford RS 200.

Because 1990 Ford RS 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Nissan Pickup. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford RS 200 (292 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Nissan Pickup. (163 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1990 Ford RS 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Nissan Pickup.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Ford RS 200 2000 Nissan Pickup
Make Ford Nissan
Model RS 200 Pickup
Year Released 1990 2000
Body Type Coupe Pickup
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 1798 cc 2494 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 250 HP 82 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4300 RPM
Torque 292 Nm 163 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1180 kg 1445 kg
Vehicle Length 4000 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1610 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2960 mm