1990 Ford RS 200 vs. 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre
To start off, 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre. (8 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre.
Because 1990 Ford RS 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre has automatic transmission and 1990 Ford RS 200 has manual transmission. 1990 Ford RS 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford RS 200 | 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre | |
| Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
| Model | RS 200 | 1 Litre |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 297 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 8 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1250 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1120 mm |
