1990 Ford RS 200 vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 470 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi Minica.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica has automatic transmission and 1990 Ford RS 200 has manual transmission. 1990 Ford RS 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford RS 200 | 2003 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | RS 200 | Minica |
Year Released | 1990 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2350 mm |