1990 Ford Sierra vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 1990 Ford Sierra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Sierra (74 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Sierra should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Sierra weights approximately 205 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Ford Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Ford Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Sierra | 1952 Saab 92 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Sierra | 92 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1952 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2480 mm |