1990 Ford Sierra vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (101 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1990 Ford Sierra. (74 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Sierra.

Because 1990 Ford Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Ford Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (155 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Sierra. (122 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Sierra.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Ford Sierra 2005 Volkswagen Polo
Make Ford Volkswagen
Model Sierra Polo
Year Released 1990 2005
Body Type Station Wagon Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1595 cc 1596 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 74 HP 101 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 122 Nm 155 Nm
Torque RPM 2900 RPM 3800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4180 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2470 mm