1990 Ford Taurus vs. 1964 Mini MK I
To start off, 1990 Ford Taurus is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,513 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Taurus (89 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1964 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1964 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Taurus weights approximately 786 kg more than 1964 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Taurus (176 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1990 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Taurus | 1964 Mini MK I | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Taurus | MK I |
Year Released | 1990 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2513 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 618 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2040 mm |