1990 Ford Taurus vs. 1992 Renault Racoon
To start off, 1992 Renault Racoon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Renault Racoon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Taurus (89 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Taurus weights approximately 399 kg more than 1992 Renault Racoon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Taurus (176 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Racoon. (107 Nm). This means 1990 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Racoon.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Taurus | 1992 Renault Racoon | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Taurus | Racoon |
Year Released | 1990 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2513 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 107 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 1005 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2770 mm |