1990 Ford Telstar vs. 2006 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Telstar would be higher. Both 1990 Ford Telstar and 2006 Nissan Hardbody are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (123 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1990 Ford Telstar. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Telstar.
Because 2006 Nissan Hardbody is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan Hardbody. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (174 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Telstar | 2006 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Telstar | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1990 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2960 mm |