1990 Ford Tempo vs. 1952 Renault Fregate
To start off, 1990 Ford Tempo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Fregate. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Fregate would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Renault Fregate weights approximately 145 kg more than 1990 Ford Tempo.
Because 1952 Renault Fregate is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Renault Fregate. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Tempo | 1952 Renault Fregate | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Tempo | Fregate |
Year Released | 1990 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2810 mm |