1990 Ford Tempo vs. 1968 Reliant Regal
To start off, 1990 Ford Tempo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Reliant Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Reliant Regal would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Tempo (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1968 Reliant Regal. (29 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1968 Reliant Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Tempo weights approximately 695 kg more than 1968 Reliant Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Reliant Regal is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Reliant Regal. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Tempo (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Reliant Regal. (46 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1990 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Reliant Regal.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Tempo | 1968 Reliant Regal | |
Make | Ford | Reliant |
Model | Tempo | Regal |
Year Released | 1990 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 29 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 46 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 60.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 61 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 455 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 1940 mm |