1990 Ford Tempo vs. 1996 Holden Nova
To start off, 1996 Holden Nova is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Holden Nova (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1990 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Tempo weights approximately 85 kg more than 1996 Holden Nova.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Tempo (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden Nova. (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1990 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Tempo | 1996 Holden Nova | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Tempo | Nova |
Year Released | 1990 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2470 mm |