1990 Ford Tempo vs. 1997 Ford Puma
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Puma (123 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1990 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Tempo weights approximately 90 kg more than 1997 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Tempo (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Puma. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1990 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Tempo | 1997 Ford Puma | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Tempo | Puma |
Year Released | 1990 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1679 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2450 mm |