1990 Ford Tempo vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (145 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1990 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 208 kg more than 1990 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Nissan Hardbody. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (208 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Tempo | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Tempo | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 208 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1358 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2960 mm |