1990 Ford Tempo vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 261 more horse power than 1990 Ford Tempo. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Tempo.
Because 2008 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Tempo | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Tempo | UTE |
Year Released | 1990 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 175 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |