1990 Ford Tempo vs. 2011 Holden Calais
To start off, 2011 Holden Calais is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 248 more horse power than 1990 Ford Tempo. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Tempo.
Because 2011 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford Tempo | 2011 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Tempo | Calais |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
