1990 Ford Tempo vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Tempo (96 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Tempo (175 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1990 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford Tempo | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Tempo | Micra |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2449 mm |
