1990 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1990 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Thunderbird (139 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 40 kg more than 1990 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Thunderbird | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Ford | Talbot |
Model | Thunderbird | Baby |
Year Released | 1990 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3130 mm |