1990 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 1997 Acura CL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura CL (145 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1990 Ford Thunderbird. (139 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 30 kg more than 1997 Acura CL.
Because 1990 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Thunderbird | 1997 Acura CL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Thunderbird | CL |
Year Released | 1990 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 65 L |