1990 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2000 GMC Safari
To start off, 2000 GMC Safari is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1990 Ford Thunderbird. (139 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 346 kg more than 1990 Ford Thunderbird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Safari (319 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Thunderbird. (291 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Thunderbird | 2000 GMC Safari | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Thunderbird | Safari |
Year Released | 1990 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 291 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2830 mm |