1990 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 Honda Saber
To start off, 2002 Honda Saber is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Saber (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1990 Ford Thunderbird. (139 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Saber should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 770 kg more than 2002 Honda Saber.
Because 1990 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Saber, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Thunderbird | 2002 Honda Saber | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Thunderbird | Saber |
Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 3205 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |