1990 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2005 Mazda Marathon
To start off, 2005 Mazda Marathon is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 103 kg more than 2005 Mazda Marathon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford Thunderbird | 2005 Mazda Marathon | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Thunderbird | Marathon |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2260 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 10 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1517 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2680 mm |
