1990 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Thunderbird (139 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 1990 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Thunderbird (291 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1990 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Thunderbird | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Thunderbird | Micra |
Year Released | 1990 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 291 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 46 L |