1990 Holden Apollo vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1990 Holden Apollo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 85 kg more than 1990 Holden Apollo.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 Holden Apollo (171 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1990 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Holden Apollo | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Apollo | Cedric |
Year Released | 1990 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |