1990 Holden Apollo vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 1990 Holden Apollo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Holden Apollo weights approximately 555 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Holden Apollo | 1966 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | Apollo | 4 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2410 mm |
