1990 Holden Apollo vs. 1981 Talbot 1510

To start off, 1990 Holden Apollo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Talbot 1510. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Talbot 1510 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1981 Talbot 1510. (63 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1981 Talbot 1510. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Holden Apollo weights approximately 155 kg more than 1981 Talbot 1510. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Holden Apollo (171 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Talbot 1510. (108 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1990 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Talbot 1510.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Holden Apollo 1981 Talbot 1510
Make Holden Talbot
Model Apollo 1510
Year Released 1990 1981
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1294 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 63 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 171 Nm 108 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1205 kg 1050 kg
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2610 mm