1990 Holden Apollo vs. 2001 Mazda B4000

To start off, 2001 Mazda B4000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda B4000 (207 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1990 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 1990 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda B4000 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1990 Holden Apollo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Mazda B4000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Mazda B4000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda B4000 (324 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Holden Apollo. (171 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda B4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Holden Apollo.

Compare all specifications: