1990 Holden Apollo vs. 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1990 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ should accelerate faster than 1990 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Holden Apollo weights approximately 347 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Holden Apollo (171 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+. (122 Nm). This means 1990 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Holden Apollo | 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ | |
Make | Holden | Suzuki |
Model | Apollo | Wagon R+ |
Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 122 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 858 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2340 mm |