1990 Holden Apollo vs. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa

To start off, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1990 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa should accelerate faster than 1990 Holden Apollo.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Holden Apollo. (171 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Holden Apollo. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa has automatic transmission and 1990 Holden Apollo has manual transmission. 1990 Holden Apollo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Holden Apollo 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa
Make Holden Mazda
Model Apollo MX-Flexa
Year Released 1990 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 2261 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 171 Nm 207 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2760 mm