1990 Holden Commodore vs. 1965 Jaguar MK II

To start off, 1990 Holden Commodore is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Holden Commodore (168 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1965 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1965 Jaguar MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 140 kg more than 1990 Holden Commodore.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Holden Commodore (292 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1990 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Jaguar MK II.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Holden Commodore 1965 Jaguar MK II
Make Holden Jaguar
Model Commodore MK II
Year Released 1990 1965
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3790 cc 2483 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 168 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 292 Nm 195 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1310 kg 1450 kg
Vehicle Length 4860 mm 5000 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1600 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2900 mm