1990 Holden Nova vs. 1968 Mazda R-100
To start off, 1990 Holden Nova is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1968 Mazda R-100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda R-100 (110 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1990 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda R-100 should accelerate faster than 1990 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Holden Nova weights approximately 210 kg more than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Because 1968 Mazda R-100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda R-100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda R-100 (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda R-100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Holden Nova | 1968 Mazda R-100 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Nova | R-100 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1963 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2270 mm |