1990 Holden Nova vs. 2006 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2006 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Holden Nova would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda DrifterX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (108 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1990 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda DrifterX should accelerate faster than 1990 Holden Nova.
Because 2006 Mazda DrifterX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda DrifterX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda DrifterX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Holden Nova | 2006 Mazda DrifterX | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | Nova | DrifterX |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 257 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3010 mm |
