1990 Holden Nova vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Holden Nova would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford C-MAX (139 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1990 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1990 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 625 kg more than 1990 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford C-MAX (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Holden Nova | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | Nova | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1990 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1623 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2649 mm |