1990 Honda Civic vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Honda Civic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Honda Civic would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Honda Civic (150 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 319 kg more than 1990 Honda Civic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Honda Civic. (148 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Honda Civic. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1990 Honda Civic has manual transmission. 1990 Honda Civic will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Honda Civic | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Honda | Mazda |
| Model | Civic | CU-X |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |
