1990 Jaguar Kensington vs. 1980 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1990 Jaguar Kensington is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar Kensington is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar Kensington (295 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar Kensington should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar Kensington (433 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1990 Jaguar Kensington will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Jaguar Kensington | 1980 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Jaguar | Zastava |
Model | Kensington | 1300 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 5344 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 433 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2430 mm |