1990 Jaguar Kensington vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1990 Jaguar Kensington is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar Kensington is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar Kensington (295 HP) has 225 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar Kensington should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1990 Jaguar Kensington is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar Kensington. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar Kensington (433 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1990 Jaguar Kensington will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Jaguar Kensington | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | Kensington | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1990 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5344 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 433 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2420 mm |