1990 Jaguar Kensington vs. 2000 Proton 300
To start off, 2000 Proton 300 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar Kensington. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar Kensington would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar Kensington is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar Kensington (295 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 2000 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar Kensington should accelerate faster than 2000 Proton 300.
Because 1990 Jaguar Kensington is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar Kensington. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar Kensington (433 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1990 Jaguar Kensington will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Jaguar Kensington | 2000 Proton 300 | |
Make | Jaguar | Proton |
Model | Kensington | 300 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5344 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 433 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2450 mm |