1990 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 1963 ZAZ Jalta
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 ZAZ Jalta would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1963 ZAZ Jalta.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. (52 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 ZAZ Jalta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jaguar XJ6 | 1963 ZAZ Jalta | |
| Make | Jaguar | ZAZ |
| Model | XJ6 | Jalta |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3239 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 299 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 54.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2030 mm |
