1990 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 1976 Mini MK III
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mini MK III would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1976 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mini MK III.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Mini MK III, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mini MK III. (61 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mini MK III.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Jaguar XJ6 | 1976 Mini MK III | |
Make | Jaguar | Mini |
Model | XJ6 | MK III |
Year Released | 1990 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3239 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 299 Nm | 61 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2040 mm |