1990 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 260. (230 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jaguar XJ6 | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
| Model | XJ6 | 260 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 3239 cc | 2848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 299 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 73 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2660 mm |
