1990 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Omega, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. (183 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Jaguar XJ6 | 1981 Oldsmobile Omega | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | XJ6 | Omega |
Year Released | 1990 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3239 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 299 Nm | 183 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2670 mm |