1990 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 1984 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1984 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jaguar XJ6 | 1984 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
| Model | XJ6 | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3239 cc | 1270 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 299 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2420 mm |
