1990 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 1986 Renault 18
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Renault 18 would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1986 Renault 18. (104 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault 18.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault 18. (163 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jaguar XJ6 | 1986 Renault 18 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | XJ6 | 18 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3239 cc | 1993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 299 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 82 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
