1990 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1994 Mazda Midge is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (104 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (156 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jaguar XJ6 | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | XJ6 | Midge |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3239 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 299 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
